Technologies and Asylum Procedures

Rate this post

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are now reviving these systems. Coming from lie detection tools analyzed at the edge to a system for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being utilized in asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/what-is-the-due-diligence-data-room just how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to understand these devices and to follow their right for safety.

It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from getting at the programs of cover. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who are regimented by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: while they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also help to make it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.

Trả lời